ORWELL WAS RIGHT: POLITICS IS THE DEFENSE OF THE INDEFENSIBLE

ITEM CULLED FROM THE HEADLINES

Cheney defends Bush's national security policies

Preserved from Yahoo! News
AP
electronic scrapbook entry for 21 May 2009
By PAMELA HESS, Associated Press Writer

Former Vice President Dick Cheney on Thursday defended the Bush administration's use of harsh interrogation methods and said the questioning led to information that deterred terrorist attacks.

In a speech delivered immediately after President Barack Obama's defense of his moves to end the severe techniques, close the Guantanamo jail and release secret documents, Cheney said the national security decisions made by former President George W. Bush kept America safe.

Cheney said the Bush-era stance was rooted in a determination to ensure the Sept. 11 attacks didn't become "a prelude to something worse."

Cheney claimed that tough interrogations "prevented the violent death of thousands, if not hundreds of thousands, of innocent people." Cheney challenged Obama to release secret documents that he contends would prove this case.

Cheney said that al-Qaida's failure to pull off another attack inside the United States over the past 7 1/2 years proves that the Bush strategy worked and should continue.

Bush-era policies ranging from harsh interrogation tactics to widened surveillance, Cheney said, were intended to prevent attacks similar in scale to the plane hijackings of the Sept. 11, 2001 terror attacks that killed more than 3,000 people.

"To the very end of our administration, we kept al-Qaida terrorists busy with other problems. We focused on getting their secrets, instead of sharing ours with them. And on our watch, they never hit this country again," Cheney said.

Despite his own criticisms, Cheney said that the public debate about interrogation practices and the Obama administration's legal framework for prosecuting terrorists is dangerous because he said it encourages terrorists to attack the United States.

"They see weakness and opportunity," Cheney said. "The terrorists see just what they were hoping for — our unity gone, our resolve shaken, our leaders distracted."

The former vice president bristled over the complaints about interrogation from lawmakers, pointing out that leading members of Congress, including House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., were briefed on the programs and methods.

"Yet for all these exacting efforts to do a hard and necessary job and to do it right, we hear from some quarters nothing but feigned outrage based on a false narrative," Cheney said. "In my long experience in Washington, few matters have inspired so much contrived indignation and phony moralizing as the interrogation methods applied to a few captured terrorists."

Speaking to an audience at the conservative American Enterprise Institute, Cheney said, "only detainees of the highest intelligence value were ever subjected to enhanced interrogation. You've heard endlessly about waterboarding. It happened to three terrorists."

Pelosi has said the CIA misled her in 2002 about whether waterboarding, which simulates drowning, had been used.

Cheney delayed the start of his address until after Obama finished his speech.

Copyright © 2009 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. The information contained in the AP News report may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed without the prior written authority of The Associated Press.

Copyright © 2009 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved.


RIGHT ASCENSION CAN HARDLY CONTAIN ITSELF

Our former vice president Cheney must believe that we have the native intelligence of toasters to actually believe anything that he says these days on any subject other than, say, fly fishing on Wyoming rivers.

The terrorist acts in question did not happen and so we do not know how many people would have died in them if they actually had happened. Cheney is speculating, if not just outright lying. We should not confuse speculating with what the scientists refer to as factual evidence. That is bodies piled up in the streets.

If Cheney wants us to believe a word he says, then he must reveal the factual evidence for us to judge.

He has not.

He will not.

Therefore, the evidence does not exist.

One of the big mysteries to me – aside from why he, Bush and Rumsfeld have not been exiled to St. Helena or Pitcarin – is why Cheney is defending the Bush administration’s indefensible acts. The almanac says that Bush was President of the United States from 2001 to 2009. Bush should do the defending in public.


WHO EXACTLY DOES CONGRESS THINK IT IS KIDDING?

It is also pretty silly for our politicians to say that the suspects at Guantanamo are too dangerous to put in American prisons. The criminals in our prisons are the World’s most expert, most hardened, most deadly bad guys on earth. I doubt that anything the supposed terrorists have to say to them by way of persuasion will make much of a dent in our criminals. And how many of these supposed terrorists speak English anyway? I suspect our prisoners will teach them a thing or two.